Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:34:30 -0500 | From | James Kosin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address |
| |
On 2/18/2010 4:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > Setting a watchpoint on address 0 seems like an entirely reasonable thing > to do. This change looks right to me. > > Thanks, > Roland
Okay with me. Most platforms use address 0x0000 for the RESET vector. Nice to catch; only problem was if it was a true RESET the information is gone anyway. If not a true RESET, the caller tried to call a function at 0x0000 which then really isn't allowed under most circumstances.
James
| |