Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Uwe Kleine-König <> | Subject | [PATCH] i2c/imx: don't add probe function to the driver struct | Date | Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:57:25 +0100 |
| |
Having a pointer to the probe function is unnecessary when using platform_driver_probe and yields a section mismatch warning after removing the white list entry "*driver" for { .data$, .data.rel$ } -> { .init.* } mismatches in modpost.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> --- Hello,
this is a new section mismatch found by modpost after my patches.
Best regards Uwe
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index 75bf820..32375bd 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c @@ -627,7 +627,6 @@ static int __exit i2c_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) } static struct platform_driver i2c_imx_driver = { - .probe = i2c_imx_probe, .remove = __exit_p(i2c_imx_remove), .driver = { .name = DRIVER_NAME, -- 1.6.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |