lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] i2c/imx: don't add probe function to the driver struct
Date
Having a pointer to the probe function is unnecessary when using
platform_driver_probe and yields a section mismatch warning after
removing the white list entry "*driver" for
{ .data$, .data.rel$ } -> { .init.* } mismatches in modpost.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,

this is a new section mismatch found by modpost after my patches.

Best regards
Uwe

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
index 75bf820..32375bd 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
@@ -627,7 +627,6 @@ static int __exit i2c_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}

static struct platform_driver i2c_imx_driver = {
- .probe = i2c_imx_probe,
.remove = __exit_p(i2c_imx_remove),
.driver = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
--
1.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-01 16:01    [W:0.049 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site