Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:00:58 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649 |
| |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:54:48AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Brown
> > I'd expect the time taken to enable to be the voltage multipled by the > > step size rather than divided by the step size?
> I don't agree at this point. The unit of step is uV/uSec. The function > should return uSec. So voltage divided by the step is more reasonable.
Ah, then the variable step is confusingly named since it's actually a rate of change rather than a step size - I'd suggest rate or something like that instead.
| |