Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | Date | Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:51:25 -0400 | Subject | Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans |
| |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 20:18, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:03:57 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:15:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch >> > mtd-nand-add-page-parameter-to-all-read_page-read_page_raw-apis.patch >> > mtd-nand-add-new-ecc-mode-ecc_hw_oob_first.patch >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips.patch >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips-update.patch >> > mtd-jffs2-fix-read-buffer-overflow.patch >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-eraseregions.patch >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-regions.patch >> > mtd-jedec_probe-fix-nec-upd29f064115-detection.patch >> > mtdpart-memory-accessor-interface-for-mtd-layer.patch >> > >> > -> dwmw2 >> >> Regarding mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch, I'm not really >> sure what happened. To recap: >> >> It was posted to the mtd list here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026805.html >> >> Kyungmin objected to the driver name change here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026807.html >> >> I pointed out that the rough rationale for the name change here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026808.html >> >> and offered to redo the patch keeping the old name if Kyungmin felt the >> rationale wasn't valid, but received no reply. Subsequently, Artem >> mentioned that he had merged it in to his l2-mtd-2.6.git tree here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026866.html >> >> which subsequently seems to not actually have happened. >> >> This is a pretty trivial patch, and I don't mind respinning it in >> whatever form folks are content with. I had assumed given the mention >> that it had been merged in to the l2 tree that the rationale was >> sufficient for merging. > > I don't think that Artem's tree is in linux-next, so I have no > visibility of what's happening with that patch. > > I do think that Artem's tree should be in linux-next. > > I guess I'll just hose the patch at dwmw2 and will see what happens. I > sent it on Aug 6, with no effect.
i guess i shouldnt try and bounce a few more mtd patches through you huh ...
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/vapier/blackfin.git;a=shortlog;h=for-mtd
hopefully they make it in this cycle (they were posted a while ago to the mtd lists w/feedback addressed) -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |