Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:18:26 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans |
| |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:03:57 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:15:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch > > mtd-nand-add-page-parameter-to-all-read_page-read_page_raw-apis.patch > > mtd-nand-add-new-ecc-mode-ecc_hw_oob_first.patch > > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips.patch > > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips-update.patch > > mtd-jffs2-fix-read-buffer-overflow.patch > > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-eraseregions.patch > > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-regions.patch > > mtd-jedec_probe-fix-nec-upd29f064115-detection.patch > > mtdpart-memory-accessor-interface-for-mtd-layer.patch > > > > -> dwmw2 > > > Regarding mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch, I'm not really > sure what happened. To recap: > > It was posted to the mtd list here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026805.html > > Kyungmin objected to the driver name change here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026807.html > > I pointed out that the rough rationale for the name change here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026808.html > > and offered to redo the patch keeping the old name if Kyungmin felt the > rationale wasn't valid, but received no reply. Subsequently, Artem > mentioned that he had merged it in to his l2-mtd-2.6.git tree here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026866.html > > which subsequently seems to not actually have happened. > > This is a pretty trivial patch, and I don't mind respinning it in > whatever form folks are content with. I had assumed given the mention > that it had been merged in to the l2 tree that the rationale was > sufficient for merging.
I don't think that Artem's tree is in linux-next, so I have no visibility of what's happening with that patch.
I do think that Artem's tree should be in linux-next.
I guess I'll just hose the patch at dwmw2 and will see what happens. I sent it on Aug 6, with no effect.
| |