Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question... | From | Matt Mackall <> | Date | Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:16:44 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 00:09 +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:30 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > > > We have lots of embedded headless systems (no keyboard/mouse, no soundcard, no > > > video) systems with *no* sources of entropy - and people using SSL. > > > > I'd rather add a random_sample_network call somewhere reasonably central > > in the network stack. Then we can use the knowledge that the sample is > > network-connected in the random core to decide how to measure its > > entropy. The trouble with IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is that many of its users > > are technically bogus as entropy sources in the current model. > > > > I'm eventually going to move the RNG away from the strict theoretical > > entropy accounting model to a more pragmatic one which will be much > > happier with iffy entropy sources, but that's a ways off. > > Btw, perhaps not the perfect question in this thread: > But what should we use to keep servers running without a hardware rng > available and without any external input besides the network? > After having ssh and openvpn die because of no random and having > the machines like dead and unreachable for me I use "ln -sf > /dev/urandom /dev/random", but that does not feel so good.
It's fine so long as you're not wearing a tinfoil hat. In fact, as the /dev/random maintainer, I'd recommend it.
Ted and I have recently been talking about revisiting the design of /dev/random to avoid these sorts of issues.
-- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
| |