Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question... | | From | Matt Mackall <> | | Date | Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:57:31 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 07:16 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > On Mon 6 Apr 2009 15:01, Matt Mackall pondered: > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:30 -0400, Robin Getz wrote: > > > We have lots of embedded headless systems (no keyboard/mouse, no > > > soundcard, no video) systems with *no* sources of entropy - and > > > people using SSL. > > > > I'd rather add a random_sample_network call somewhere reasonably central > > in the network stack. Then we can use the knowledge that the sample is > > network-connected in the random core to decide how to measure its > > entropy. The trouble with IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is that many of its users > > are technically bogus as entropy sources in the current model. > > OK - that makes more sense. > > Does that mean we also shouldn't be using IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM on interrupt > sources in subsystems which already have add_xxx_randomness() in them? (block > devices, and input devices?) > > block/blk-core.c -> blk_end_io() -> add_disk_randomness() > drivers/input/input.c -> input_event() -> add_input_randomness() > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c, line 639 > > drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c, line 374 > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c, line 145 > drivers/input/keyboard/bf54x-keys.c, line 255 > drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c, line 881
Yes. The flag needs to be taken out and shot. Everything going into the RNG should be made to go through an add_*_randomness interface only. Preferably not at a per-driver level.
-- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
|  |