[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectSwappiness vs. mmap() and interactive response

    So, I just set up Ubuntu Jaunty (using Linux 2.6.28) on a quad core phenom box,
    and then I did the following (with XFS over LVM):

    mv /500gig/of/data/on/disk/one /disk/two

    This quickly caused the system to. grind.. to... a.... complete..... halt.
    Basically every UI operation, including the mouse in Xorg, started experiencing
    multiple second lag and delays. This made the system essentially unusable --
    for example, just flipping to the window where the "mv" command was running
    took 10 seconds on more than one occasion. Basically a "click and get coffee"

    There was no particular kernel CPU load -- the SATA DMA seemed fine.

    If I actively used the GUI, then the pieces I was using would work better, but
    they'd start experiencing astonishing latency again if I just let the UI sit
    for a little while. From this, I diagnosed that the problem was probably
    related to the VM paging out my GUI.

    Next, I set the following:

    echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness

    ... hoping it would prevent paging out of the UI in favor of file data that's
    only used once. It did appear to help to a small degree, but not much. The
    system is still effectively unusable while a file copy is going on.

    From this, I diagnosed that most likely, the kernel was paging out all my
    application file mmap() data (such as my executables and shared libraries) in
    favor of total garbage VM load from the file copy.

    I don't know how to verify that this is true definitively. Are there some
    magic numbers in /proc I can look at? However, I did run latencytop, and it
    showed massive 2000+ msec latency in the page fault handler, as well as in
    various operations such as XFS read.

    Could this be something else? There were some long delays in latencytop from
    various apps doing fsync as well, but it seems unlikely that this would destroy
    latency in Xorg, and again, latency improved whenever I touched an app, for
    that app.

    Is there any way to fix this, short of rewriting the VM myself? For example,
    is there some way I could convince this VM that pages with active mappings are


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-28 06:59    [W:0.024 / U:10.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site