lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional
On 11:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yes, I believe it would be easier than having dynamically allocated
> arrays. Dynamically generated arrays using static memory allocations
> (bss) is one thing, but that would only reduce size of the module on
> disk, which I don't think anyone considers a problem.

We would save 64K of RAM in the raid5-only case if we'd defer the
allocation of the multiplication table until the first raid6 array
is about to be started.


Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-22 21:07    [W:0.218 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site