Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:26:28 -0500 (EST) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change? |
| |
given that the Kbuild "unifdef-y" directive was tagged as obsolete in favour of "header-y" well over a year ago, any objection to just standardizing everything on header-y and removing all support for unifdef-y?
is there any compelling reason to *not* do that?
rday --
======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================
| |