[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree

* Tejun Heo <> wrote:

> 11/26/2009 05:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of
> > refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the
> > regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code
> > and conflicts are likely in the future.
> Sure, which sched/* branch should I base these patches on?

You could send the patch you rely on standalone (it seems to be a single
patch) and we can look at applying it to the scheduler tree. That
reduces the conflicts on an ongoing basis. Please Cc: PeterZ and Mike
Galbraith as well.



 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-26 10:29    [W:0.070 / U:3.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site