lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree

* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> 11/26/2009 05:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of
> > refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the
> > regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code
> > and conflicts are likely in the future.
>
> Sure, which sched/* branch should I base these patches on?

You could send the patch you rely on standalone (it seems to be a single
patch) and we can look at applying it to the scheduler tree. That
reduces the conflicts on an ongoing basis. Please Cc: PeterZ and Mike
Galbraith as well.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-26 10:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site