Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:26:31 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree |
| |
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> 11/26/2009 05:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of > > refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the > > regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code > > and conflicts are likely in the future. > > Sure, which sched/* branch should I base these patches on?
You could send the patch you rely on standalone (it seems to be a single patch) and we can look at applying it to the scheduler tree. That reduces the conflicts on an ongoing basis. Please Cc: PeterZ and Mike Galbraith as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |