[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages

* Mike Travis <> wrote:

> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >On 11/12/2009 02:22 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >>But I don't disagree with Andi either, that it's not particularly useful,
> >>and we can get all this from userspace in /proc/cpuinfo, or x86info.
> >>
> >
> > I personally don't think it's useful at all. It gives information
> > about the processor which can be obtained from other sources. What
> > we want is enough information that the CPU can be unambiguously
> > identified, so that when someone posts dmesg we can tell what
> > machine they came from.
> Can we say the same thing about the sched debug messages? It's even
> more painful because the number of lines output is exponential to the
> number of cpus.

Yeah - but instead of getting rid of them please tie them to a (default
off) debug switch. There's been the occasional crash where they were


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-14 01:57    [W:0.145 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site