Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:03:52 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Unnecessary overhead with stack protector. |
| |
* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:37:06 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > This looks like a fairly serious problem to me, but I'm confused by the > > > > commit ID. February 2008 - is this correct? > > > > > > > > > > That date is pure fiction AFAICT. And the Mercurial kernel repo says May 2008... > > > Is there some way to get the date a change was merged into the official tree as > > > opposed to the date it was created in some other tree? > > > > oh, so someone _did_ read my email! > > > > > > git show --pretty=fuller 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115 > > > > commit 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115 > > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 14 10:36:03 2008 +0100 > > Commit: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > CommitDate: Mon May 26 16:15:32 2008 +0200 > > > > I think the CommitDate is when it hit mainline. > > The X-Git-Tag from the web page says it first appeared in mainline in > 2.6.30-rc1: > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:36:03 +0000 (+0100) > Subject: x86: unify stackprotector features > X-Git-Tag: v2.6.30-rc1~2^2~50^2~67^2~11 > X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=113c5413c > > Looks like it went through three merges on the way there?
yep. Note that x86/urgent has this queued up now:
14a3f40: x86: Remove STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
Ingo
| |