lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Unnecessary overhead with stack protector.
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:37:06 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > > This looks like a fairly serious problem to me, but I'm confused by the
> > > commit ID. February 2008 - is this correct?
> > >
> >
> > That date is pure fiction AFAICT. And the Mercurial kernel repo says May 2008...
> > Is there some way to get the date a change was merged into the official tree as
> > opposed to the date it was created in some other tree?
>
> oh, so someone _did_ read my email!
>
>
> git show --pretty=fuller 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115
>
> commit 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> AuthorDate: Thu Feb 14 10:36:03 2008 +0100
> Commit: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CommitDate: Mon May 26 16:15:32 2008 +0200
>
> I think the CommitDate is when it hit mainline.

The X-Git-Tag from the web page says it first appeared in mainline in
2.6.30-rc1:

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:36:03 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: x86: unify stackprotector features
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.30-rc1~2^2~50^2~67^2~11
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=113c5413c

Looks like it went through three merges on the way there?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-26 18:01    [W:0.105 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site