Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:56:15 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: Unnecessary overhead with stack protector. |
| |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:37:06 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > This looks like a fairly serious problem to me, but I'm confused by the > > > commit ID. February 2008 - is this correct? > > > > > > > That date is pure fiction AFAICT. And the Mercurial kernel repo says May 2008... > > Is there some way to get the date a change was merged into the official tree as > > opposed to the date it was created in some other tree? > > oh, so someone _did_ read my email! > > > git show --pretty=fuller 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115 > > commit 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115 > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 14 10:36:03 2008 +0100 > Commit: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > CommitDate: Mon May 26 16:15:32 2008 +0200 > > I think the CommitDate is when it hit mainline.
The X-Git-Tag from the web page says it first appeared in mainline in 2.6.30-rc1:
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:36:03 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86: unify stackprotector features X-Git-Tag: v2.6.30-rc1~2^2~50^2~67^2~11 X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=113c5413c
Looks like it went through three merges on the way there?
| |