lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectcommit 68e5e9d734503695915734e50e9427624cf8f3b2 (Re: vfb: make virtual framebuffer mmapable)
Is there any particular reason why this change uses vmalloc_32()
rather than simply vmalloc()? I can't see why the underlying physical
address width would matter here in any way...

Thanks, Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-02 12:21    [W:0.029 / U:1.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site