Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:16:34 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include |
| |
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> >> >>>> In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky >>>> first about how well they actually work in their usecases. >>>> >>> Well, you don't need to wait, I think. >>> >>> All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How >>> we support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one. >>> >>> We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme >>> is better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme. >>> Surely, Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he >>> tested it lightly). >>> >> >> Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas: >> >> >> Here's a work in progress series [...] >> >> >> >> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to >> do >> anything extensive. >> >> Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current >> tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus? >> > > I'm going to be on vacation until the 12th, so I won't have a chance to > do anything until then (perhaps Ian will have a chance to poke at them > before then). I'm expecting Becky's patches to work as-is, or if not, > be easily fixed with a couple of small bugfix patches. So I say go > ahead if they work for everyone else.
ok, i have put it into the to-Linus pile.
Ingo
| |