lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky
>>>> first about how well they actually work in their usecases.
>>>>
>>> Well, you don't need to wait, I think.
>>>
>>> All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How
>>> we support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one.
>>>
>>> We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme
>>> is better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme.
>>> Surely, Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he
>>> tested it lightly).
>>>
>>
>> Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas:
>>
>> >> Here's a work in progress series [...]
>> >>
>> >> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to
>> do >> anything extensive.
>>
>> Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current
>> tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus?
>>
>
> I'm going to be on vacation until the 12th, so I won't have a chance to
> do anything until then (perhaps Ian will have a chance to poke at them
> before then). I'm expecting Becky's patches to work as-is, or if not,
> be easily fixed with a couple of small bugfix patches. So I say go
> ahead if they work for everyone else.

ok, i have put it into the to-Linus pile.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-05 14:19    [W:0.193 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site