lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for September 3


On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> <plugs it in>
>
> cs: pcmcia_socket0: unable to apply power.
> pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0
> pci 0000:07:00.0: supports D1
> pci 0000:07:00.0: supports D2
> pci 0000:07:00.0: PME# supported from D1 D2 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:07:00.0: PME# disabled
>
> sony:/home/akpm> lspci -s07:00
> 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3cCFE575CT CardBus [Cyclone] (rev 10)

Ok, the PCI resource side definitely works.

I've committed the fix as follows.. (the explanation is about three times
the size, but whatever ;)

As to that "unable to apply power" thing, that's a separate issue.. And
in fact one that probably doesn't even matter to a CardBus card, since
cardbus doesn't care about the insane CS state machines anyway.

Anyway, Ivan and Jesse cc'd for the patch, but I committed it, since I
was involved in causing the bug in the first place.

Linus

---
commit 5f17cfce5776c566d64430f543a289e5cfa4538b
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Sep 4 01:33:59 2008 -0700
PCI: fix pbus_size_mem() resource alignment for CardBus controllers

Commit 884525655d07fdee9245716b998ecdc45cdd8007 ("PCI: clean up resource
alignment management") changed the resource handling to mark how a
resource was aligned on a per-resource basis.

Thus, instead of looking at the resource number to determine whether it
was a bridge resource or a regular resource (they have different
alignment rules), we should just ask the resource for its alignment
directly.

The reason this broke only cardbus resources was that for the other
types of resources, the old way of deciding alignment actually still
happened to work. But CardBus bridge resources had been changed by
commit 934b7024f0ed29003c95cef447d92737ab86dc4f ("Fix cardbus resource
allocation") to look more like regular resources than PCI bridge
resources from an alignment handling standpoint.

Reported-and-tested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index 82634a2..1aad599 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -352,11 +352,12 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask, unsigned long
continue;
r_size = r->end - r->start + 1;
/* For bridges size != alignment */
- align = (i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) ? r_size : r->start;
+ align = resource_alignment(r);
order = __ffs(align) - 20;
if (order > 11) {
- dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d too large: "
+ dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d bad alignment %llx: "
"%#016llx-%#016llx\n", i,
+ (unsigned long long)align,
(unsigned long long)r->start,
(unsigned long long)r->end);
r->flags = 0;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-04 10:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans