Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:33:23 +0900 | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs |
| |
> > + int node = numa_node_id(); > > + struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones; > > + int num_cpus_on_node; > > + node_to_cpumask_ptr(cpumask_on_node, node); > > > > node_free_pages = > > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA > > @@ -38,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned > > zone_page_state(&zones[ZONE_NORMAL], NR_FREE_PAGES); > > > > max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM; > > + > > + num_cpus_on_node = cpus_weight_nr(*cpumask_on_node); > > + max /= num_cpus_on_node; > > + > > return max(max, min_pages); > > Exactly! And (many thanks to them!) the sparc maintainers have > implemented a similar internal function definition for node_to_cpumask_ptr().
Can I think get your Ack?
| |