Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 03 May 2008 03:19:00 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:12:06 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > >> The first >> problem is working out "how the heck did that patch get into linux-next"? >> That would be much easier if the signoff trail was complete for git-based >> patches, but it often is not. > > doh. I'm pulling linux-next's constituent trees independently, so if I > spot a turd in linux-next I can just grep the various git trees to find out > where it came from. > > It seems wrong though...
What about the committer info? Well, I suppose a nobody@localhost slips in, but more often I expect it to be something more telling than that. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |