Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 | From | Pierre Ossman <> | Subject | Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next |
| |
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Pierre, > > On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:36:15 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote: > > > > The stuff I've pushed to Andrew has always been what I've been hoping > > to merge in the next window, so it should just be a matter of renaming > > the branch. There is a #next at the above URI now. > > I have added that for tomorrow, thanks. > > I noticed that that tree also has a for-linus branch. Would that be bug > fixes and stuff lined up for this release i.e. 2.6.26? If so, I could > add that to linux-next as well as one of the early merge trees. >
That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.
-- -- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
| |