[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/5] infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects
    On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:26:18 -0000
    > Thomas Gleixner <> wrote:
    > > The debugobjects core code keeps track of operations on static and
    > > dynamic objects by inserting them into a hashed list and sanity
    > > checking them on object operations and provides additional checks
    > > whenever kernel memory is freed.
    > Prime candidates for conversion to this interface are locks: spinlocks,
    > rwlocks, mutexes, etc.
    > a) it'd be interesting to get that done, as a proof-of-usefulness thing.

    /me looks for volunteers :)

    > b) but this code internally uses spinlocks. Will it explode?

    It should not, but we can use untracked spinlocks for the internals.

    > also list_heads and hlists. But
    > a) that might be a bit redundant against the custome debugging which lists
    > already have and


    > b) this code uses lists and hlists internally?

    Yes, it uses hlists.



     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-25 09:25    [W:0.022 / U:9.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site