![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:26:18 -0000 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > The debugobjects core code keeps track of operations on static and > dynamic objects by inserting them into a hashed list and sanity > checking them on object operations and provides additional checks > whenever kernel memory is freed. Prime candidates for conversion to this interface are locks: spinlocks, rwlocks, mutexes, etc. a) it'd be interesting to get that done, as a proof-of-usefulness thing. b) but this code internally uses spinlocks. Will it explode? also list_heads and hlists. But a) that might be a bit redundant against the custome debugging which lists already have and b) this code uses lists and hlists internally? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-24 20:09 [W:0.446 / U:0.050 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||