Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:31:52 +0100 (CET) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Also why is this a choice? Are more RCU types planned? > > Why shouldn't it be a choice? You can have CLASSIC_RCU or PREEMPT_RCU, one > or the other and not both. Sounds perfect for being a choice.
With this logic almost every bool could be implemented via choice. A simple bool perfectly gives you two choices too.
bye, Roman
| |