lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation
Hi,

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > Also why is this a choice? Are more RCU types planned?
>
> Why shouldn't it be a choice? You can have CLASSIC_RCU or PREEMPT_RCU, one
> or the other and not both. Sounds perfect for being a choice.

With this logic almost every bool could be implemented via choice.
A simple bool perfectly gives you two choices too.

bye, Roman


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-29 15:35    [W:0.197 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site