Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:53:18 -0500 (EST) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation |
| |
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Also why is this a choice? Are more RCU types planned?
Why shouldn't it be a choice? You can have CLASSIC_RCU or PREEMPT_RCU, one or the other and not both. Sounds perfect for being a choice.
-- Steve
| |