[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SLUB defrag pull request?
    Hi Miklos,

    On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 00:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
    > Actually, no: looking at the slub code it already makes sure that
    > objects are neither poisoned, nor touched in any way _if_ there is a
    > constructor for the object. And for good reason too, otherwise a
    > reused object would contain rubbish after a second allocation.

    There's no inherent reason why we cannot poison slab caches with a
    constructor. As a matter of fact SLAB does it which is probably why I
    got confused here. The only thing that needs to disable slab poisoning
    by design is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.

    But for SLUB, you're obviously right.

    On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 00:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
    > Come on guys, you should be the experts in this thing!

    Yeah, I know. Yet you're stuck with us. That's sad.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-23 09:13    [W:0.026 / U:0.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site