[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SLUB defrag pull request?
Hi Miklos,

On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 00:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Actually, no: looking at the slub code it already makes sure that
> objects are neither poisoned, nor touched in any way _if_ there is a
> constructor for the object. And for good reason too, otherwise a
> reused object would contain rubbish after a second allocation.

There's no inherent reason why we cannot poison slab caches with a
constructor. As a matter of fact SLAB does it which is probably why I
got confused here. The only thing that needs to disable slab poisoning
by design is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.

But for SLUB, you're obviously right.

On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 00:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Come on guys, you should be the experts in this thing!

Yeah, I know. Yet you're stuck with us. That's sad.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 09:13    [W:0.115 / U:1.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site