[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kfree(0) - ok?
On 08/15/2007 09:28 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:

>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> NULL is not 0 though.
>> It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero,
> C guarantees that.

C guarantees what? If you're disagreeing with Jason -- he's right.

>> but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a
>> null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be
>> #defined as 0 or a cast thereof).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-15 10:45    [W:0.082 / U:6.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site