Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:28:54 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | | Subject | Re: kfree(0) - ok? |
| |
On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote: >On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> NULL is not 0 though. > >It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero,
C guarantees that.
>but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a >null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be >#defined as 0 or a cast thereof). >
Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |