![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris Wright wrote: >> --- >> [chrisw: Why is this not upstream yet?] > > And equally importantly, why is it even in the stable queue if it's not > upstream. > > It's against stable rules, and it means that we may have stuff that gets > fixed in -stable and not in -upstream, if people don't notice. THAT IS > BAD! > > Having fixes in stable that don't exist in upstream make -stable be > worse than pointless - it means that we actively _lose_ bug-reports. It > may sound like a good idea in the short run, but it's a *horrible* thing > for the long run. > > IOW, this should not be on the table for -stable, and people involved > should have made sure it's in -upstream first! Strongly agreed. > And no, I do not think it's languishing in my mailqueue. I'm pretty sure > it's languishing somewhere else. AFAIK it was obsoleted by another Tejun patch which -is- upstream. Am I missing something? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-21 23:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||