lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] A need for "yesno"-function? (and "cleanup" of kernel.h) (was: Re: [KJ] [RFC] A need for a "yesno"-function?)
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:24 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> more readable). The big problem is, where to put it? Seems wrong to put
>> in <linux/string.h> since it appear to be a replica of userspace's
>> <string.h> (otherwise, why put mem*-functions in there?).
>>
>
> memcpy(3) and memcmp(3) are also there in user-space.
>
Did I miss something or did you just restate what was stated? (If it was
not a replica, I think the mem*-functions would be better placed in
memory.h, or such)

Richard Knutsson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-16 18:23    [W:0.103 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site