lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] A need for "yesno"-function? (and "cleanup" of kernel.h) (was: Re: [KJ] [RFC] A need for a "yesno"-function?)
    Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
    > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:24 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
    > [...]
    >
    >> more readable). The big problem is, where to put it? Seems wrong to put
    >> in <linux/string.h> since it appear to be a replica of userspace's
    >> <string.h> (otherwise, why put mem*-functions in there?).
    >>
    >
    > memcpy(3) and memcmp(3) are also there in user-space.
    >
    Did I miss something or did you just restate what was stated? (If it was
    not a replica, I think the mem*-functions would be better placed in
    memory.h, or such)

    Richard Knutsson

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-16 18:23    [W:0.019 / U:88.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site