lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] A need for "yesno"-function? (and "cleanup" of kernel.h)
From
Date
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 18:09 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:24 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> more readable). The big problem is, where to put it? Seems wrong to put
> >> in <linux/string.h> since it appear to be a replica of userspace's
> >> <string.h> (otherwise, why put mem*-functions in there?).
> >>
> >
> > memcpy(3) and memcmp(3) are also there in user-space.
> >
> Did I miss something or did you just restate what was stated? (If it was
> not a replica, I think the mem*-functions would be better placed in
> memory.h, or such)

Ah, I misunderstood it as if you wonder why mem*() functions in
<string.h>.
Sorry.

Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-16 18:19    [W:0.029 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site