![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 11/5/07, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote: > > The current omap udc dosen't support the DMA mode>> It most certainly does!! I think you it has DMA issues on OMAP2. > Ah, Yes, OMAP1 supports the DMA mode. It means the OMAP2 DMA support. >> > and it has some problem at setup time on OMAP2 with previous patch file. > > I found that the code assumes bulk out required the big data transfer. > > But MODE SELECT(6) sent the only 24 bytes. it makes a problem. > > So I implement the small packets handling for it.> >> > It is tested with both linux and windows.> >> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>>> I'll have a look at it, thanks.>> Is this aginst the linux-omap tree, or current kernel.org code? > (There _shouldn't_ be any differences, but I've not checked in > some time now and such issues do creep in from time to time.) > There's some difference related with double buffering. It's against the latest kernel code. I checked it. Thank you, Kyungmin Park - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-11-05 07:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||