[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 18:17 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:00:55 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <> wrote:
> > This is a full replacement queue for the high resolution timer / dynamic
> > ticks implemementation in -mm.
> The Vaio broke again. Seems to hang permanently the first time it tries to
> sleep. The cursor doesn't flash. Adding "clock=pit" doesn't fix it. I'm
> disinclined to bisect it since the patch series fails to compile at
> practically all bisections points.
> I'll drop all the patches, which means I drop John's vsyscall patches and
> his x86_64 conversion as well.

"He's got a bug!"
What's his bug got to do with me?
"He's got a bug!"
I ain't trying to hear that, see?

But seriously (the above might be too obscure of a reference :), my
x86_64 GTOD patches were against vanilla and were not dependent on the
HRT patches. There were a few merge/fixup patches in your tree, but I
don't recall many of them being really interleaved w/ the HRT code. I'm
I missing or forgetting some bit?

Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current
tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first?

"ain't no future in fronting"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-29 22:35    [W:0.152 / U:2.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site