[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Heads up on a series of AIO patchsets
    > > Any details?
    > Well, one path I tried I couldn't help but post a blog entry about
    > for my friends. I'm not sure it's the direction I'll take with linux-
    > kernel, but the fundamentals are there: the api should be the
    > syscall interface, and there should be no difference between sync and
    > async behaviour.

    Any code you're willing to let people play with? I could at least have
    real test cases, and a library to go along with it as it gets

    Another pie in the sky idea:
    One thing that's been bugging me lately (working on a 9p server), is
    sendfile is hard to use in practice because you need packet headers
    and such, and they need to go out at the same time.

    Sendfile listio support would fix this, but it's not a general
    solution. What would be really usefull is a way to say that a certain
    batch of async ops either all succeed or all fail, and happen
    atomically; i.e., transactions for syscalls.

    Probably even harder to do than general async syscalls, but it'd be
    the best thing since sliced bread... and hey, it seems the logical
    next step.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-03 02:21    [W:0.023 / U:15.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site