Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:11:02 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros. |
| |
On Jan 1 2007 18:51, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> If people want to return something from a ({ }) construct, they should do >> it >> explicitly, e.g. >> >> #define setcc(cc) ({ \ >> partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \ >> partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \ >> partial_status; \ >> }) > > No, they generally should use an inline function instead.
Perhaps. But that won't work with defines where typeof is involved.
-`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |