![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> If people want to return something from a ({ }) construct, they should
> do it> explicitly, e.g.>> #define setcc(cc) ({ \> partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
> partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
> partial_status; \
> })
No, they generally should use an inline function instead.
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-01 17:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||