[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[RFC][PATCH 0/2] Swap token re-tuned

Here's a brief up on the next two mails.


In the current implementation of swap token tuning, grab swap token is
made from :
1) after page_cache_read (filemap.c) and
2) after the readahead logic in do_swap_page (memory.c)

IMO, the contention for the swap token should happen _before_ the
aforementioned calls, because in the event of low system memory, calls
to freeup space will be made later from page_cache_read and
read_swap_cache_async , so we want to avoid "false LRU" pages by
grabbing the token before the VM starts searching for replacement


Instead of using TIMEOUT as a parameter to transfer the token, I think a
better solution is to hand it over to a process that proves its

What my scheme does, is to find out how frequently a process is calling
these functions. The processes that call these more frequently get a
higher priority.
The idea is to guarantee that a high priority process gets the token.
The priority of a process is determined by the number of consecutive
calls to swap-in and no-page. I mean "consecutive" not from the
scheduler point of view, but from the process point of view. In other
words, if the task called these functions every time it was scheduled,
it means it is not getting any further with its execution.

This way, its a matter of simple comparison of task priorities, to
decide whether to transfer the token or not.

I did some testing with the two patches combined and the results are as

Current Upstream implementation:
root@ashbert:~/crap# time ./qsbench -n 9000000 -p 3 -s 1420300
seed = 1420300
seed = 1420300
seed = 1420300
real 3m40.124s
user 0m12.060s
sys 0m0.940s

With my implementation :
root@ashbert:~/crap# time ./qsbench -n 9000000 -p 3 -s 1420300
seed = 1420300
seed = 1420300
seed = 1420300
real 2m58.708s
user 0m11.880s
sys 0m1.070s

My test machine:

1.69Ghz CPU
7200rpm hdd
2MB L2 cache
vanilla kernel 2.6.18
Ubuntu dapper with gnome.

Any comments, suggestions, ideas ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-29 20:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean