lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
Date
On Thursday 28 September 2006 13:39, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't you just use a constant expression here? A global variable
> > for it sounds rather strange, especially since the local_irq_disable()
> > calls are sometimes nested, not to mention the problems you'd hit on
> > SMP?
>
> It's not a constant - there are some {un,}mask_irq functions that may
> change it.  We don't have SMP, obviously it would have to be per-CPU if
> we did.
>
Ok, got it now. I did not realize that you use the same register
for global irq enable and for specific interrupts that can be masked.

Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-28 14:39    [W:0.101 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site