[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
    On Thursday 28 September 2006 13:39, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
    > > Shouldn't you just use a constant expression here? A global variable
    > > for it sounds rather strange, especially since the local_irq_disable()
    > > calls are sometimes nested, not to mention the problems you'd hit on
    > > SMP?
    > It's not a constant - there are some {un,}mask_irq functions that may
    > change it.  We don't have SMP, obviously it would have to be per-CPU if
    > we did.
    Ok, got it now. I did not realize that you use the same register
    for global irq enable and for specific interrupts that can be masked.

    Arnd <><
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-28 14:39    [W:0.021 / U:113.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site