lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2
On 12/09/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc6/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/
>

My FC6T2 bug appeared in -mm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202223

Any ideas about this?

echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk; echo disk > /sys/power/state

CPU 1 is now offline
lockdep: not fixing up alternatives.

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.18-rc6-mm2 #120
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/1961 is trying to acquire lock:
((cpu_chain).rwsem){----}, at: [<c012e289>]
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x2d

but task is already holding lock:
(workqueue_mutex){--..}, at: [<c02f8156>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (workqueue_mutex){--..}:
[<c0138b97>] add_lock_to_list+0x5c/0x7a
[<c013aca0>] __lock_acquire+0x9ec/0xae8
[<c013b0fc>] lock_acquire+0x6b/0x88
[<c02f7f1b>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xd6/0x2f5
[<c02f8156>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
[<c01312de>] workqueue_cpu_callback+0x109/0x1ff
[<c012de43>] notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x31
[<c012e295>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1d/0x2d
[<c013f867>] _cpu_down+0x48/0x207
[<c013fbf8>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x98/0x12c
[<c01451d6>] prepare_processes+0xe/0x41
[<c014539e>] pm_suspend_disk+0x9/0xe2
[<c0144635>] enter_state+0x53/0x177
[<c01447df>] state_store+0x86/0x9c
[<c01abde4>] subsys_attr_store+0x20/0x25
[<c01abee3>] sysfs_write_file+0xa6/0xcc
[<c0174d60>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x174
[<c01753fa>] sys_write+0x3b/0x71
[<c0103156>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #0 ((cpu_chain).rwsem){----}:
[<c013a280>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x2e/0x62
[<c013abd7>] __lock_acquire+0x923/0xae8
[<c013b0fc>] lock_acquire+0x6b/0x88
[<c0136e60>] down_read+0x28/0x3b
[<c012e289>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x2d
[<c013f98e>] _cpu_down+0x16f/0x207
[<c013fbf8>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x98/0x12c
[<c01451d6>] prepare_processes+0xe/0x41
[<c014539e>] pm_suspend_disk+0x9/0xe2
[<c0144635>] enter_state+0x53/0x177
[<c01447df>] state_store+0x86/0x9c
[<c01abde4>] subsys_attr_store+0x20/0x25
[<c01abee3>] sysfs_write_file+0xa6/0xcc
[<c0174d60>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x174
[<c01753fa>] sys_write+0x3b/0x71
[<c0103156>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by bash/1961:
#0: (cpu_add_remove_lock){--..}, at: [<c02f8156>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
#1: (workqueue_mutex){--..}, at: [<c02f8156>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

stack backtrace:
[<c01041ba>] dump_trace+0x63/0x1ca
[<c0104333>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25
[<c0104993>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c0104a58>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
[<c013a2a9>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x57/0x62
[<c013abd7>] __lock_acquire+0x923/0xae8
[<c013b0fc>] lock_acquire+0x6b/0x88
[<c0136e60>] down_read+0x28/0x3b
[<c012e289>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x2d
[<c013f98e>] _cpu_down+0x16f/0x207
[<c013fbf8>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x98/0x12c
[<c01451d6>] prepare_processes+0xe/0x41
[<c014539e>] pm_suspend_disk+0x9/0xe2
[<c0144635>] enter_state+0x53/0x177
[<c01447df>] state_store+0x86/0x9c
[<c01abde4>] subsys_attr_store+0x20/0x25
[<c01abee3>] sysfs_write_file+0xa6/0xcc
[<c0174d60>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x174
[<c01753fa>] sys_write+0x3b/0x71
[<c0103156>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99

Leftover inexact backtrace:

l *blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x2d
0xc012e278 is in blocking_notifier_call_chain
(/usr/src/linux-mm/kernel/sys.c:324).
319 * of the last notifier function called.
320 */
321
322 int blocking_notifier_call_chain(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
323 unsigned long val, void *v)
324 {
325 int ret;
326
327 down_read(&nh->rwsem);
328 ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v);

l *mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
0xc02f813a is in mutex_lock (/usr/src/linux-mm/kernel/mutex.c:85).
80 * deadlock debugging. )
81 *
82 * This function is similar to (but not equivalent to) down().
83 */
84 void inline fastcall __sched mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock)
85 {
86 might_sleep();
87 /*
88 * The locking fastpath is the 1->0 transition from
89 * 'unlocked' into 'locked' state.

http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/mm-dmesg2
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/mm-config1

Regards,
Michal

--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-12 21:13    [W:0.262 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site