![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Horms wrote: > > I also agree that it is non-intitive. But I wonder if a cleaner > fix would be to remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START all together. Isn't > it just a work around for the kernel not being relocatable, or > are there uses for it that relocation can't replace? > Yes, booting with the 2^n existing bootloaders. Relocation, as far as I've understood this patch, refers to loaded address, not runtime address. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-08 06:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||