lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 8 Aug 2006 15:09:58 +0900
FromHorms <>
SubjectRe: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:32:23PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >
> >I also agree that it is non-intitive. But I wonder if a cleaner
> >fix would be to remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START all together. Isn't
> >it just a work around for the kernel not being relocatable, or
> >are there uses for it that relocation can't replace?
> >
> 
> Yes, booting with the 2^n existing bootloaders.

Ok, I must be confused then. I though CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START was
introduced in order to allow an alternative address to be provided for
kdump, and that previously it was hard-coded to some
architecture-specific value.

What I was really getting as is if it needs to be configurable at
compile time or not. Obviously there needs to be some sane default
regardless.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-08 08:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008