Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:27:22 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY |
| |
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:15:10 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > They are config characteristics (in many cases). Hiding them in > > header files with dummy inlines or with ARCH_HAS_XYZZY is still > > hiding them IMO, although the inlines are better than the > > ARCH_HAS_XYZZY method. I prefer to see them in the config space > > since I think that's where they belong. > > That's just a different way to write a #define. You could as > well keep the originals then.
yes, except that 1. these aren't buried in random header files 2. these are in the kconfig system & namespace where they belong
--- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |