![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:55:23PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > ZFS was already called ,,blatant layering violation''. ;) I kind of like the phrase "blatant layering violation" - catchy, isn't it? The main reason people think of ZFS as a blatant layering violation is because it has the letters "FS" in the name, but it does a lot more than a file system. ZFS actually includes three distinct layers with well-defined interfaces, none of which directly maps to most people's conception of a "file system." The really painfully short summary of the layers is: SPA - Storage Pool Allocator, disks go into the bottom, virtually addressed, explicitly freed/allocated blocks come out of the top DMU - Data Management Unit, virtually addressed blocks go in the bottom, plain objects come out the top (an object is like a file with no dangly bits like permissions, etc.) ZPL - ZFS POSIX Layer, plain objects go in the bottom, VFS ops come out the top For a really nice, much more detailed ZFS source tour, see: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/ -VAL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-06 02:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||