Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:46:02 +0800 | From | Albert Lee <> | Subject | Re: + via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
matthieu castet wrote: > matthieu castet wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> Albert Lee wrote: >> >>> castet.matthieu@free.fr wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> Could you please test the current libata-upstream tree and >>>>> turn on ATA_DEBUG and ATA_VERBOSE_DEBUG in include/linux/libata.h. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is there a easy way to get libata-upstream tree ? >>>> Do I need to install git for that or there are some snapshots >>>> somewhere ? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Matthieu, >>> >>> Tejun has a patch against 2.6.17: >>> http://home-tj.org/files/libata-tj-stable/libata-tj-2.6.17-20060625-1.tar.bz2 >>> >>> >> I don't know if I did someting wrong, but it didn't apply cleanly. >> So I enable the trace on lastest -mm kernel and I disable the via quirk. >> >> But the printk in the interrupt handler takes some times and hides the >> altstatus delay. >> >> I will try to send you a trace, where I move the printk at the end of >> the interrupt handler. >> >> > After apllying the following patch to -mm, I got > http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/tmp/ata_log > > Matthieu
Hi Matthieu,
Thanks for the log. But could you please keep the VPRINTK() in the entrance of ata_host_intr() and add some message to distinguish the three VPRINTK()s?
(This will make the log easier to read. Detail below.)
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Index: linux-2.6.16/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.16.orig/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2006-07-02 10:32:33.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.16/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2006-07-02 10:38:03.000000000 +0200 > @@ -4722,9 +4722,6 @@ > { > u8 status, host_stat = 0; > > - VPRINTK("ata%u: protocol %d task_state %d\n", > - ap->id, qc->tf.protocol, ap->hsm_task_state); > -
Please keep this VPRINTK() and add "ENTER" to it. Something like "ata%u: ENTER protocol...".
> /* Check whether we are expecting interrupt in this state */ > switch (ap->hsm_task_state) { > case HSM_ST_FIRST: > @@ -4780,6 +4777,9 @@ > ap->ops->irq_clear(ap); > > ata_hsm_move(ap, qc, status, 0); > + VPRINTK("ata%u: protocol %d task_state %d\n", > + ap->id, qc->tf.protocol, ap->hsm_task_state); > + > return 1; /* irq handled */ >
Please add additional message "HANDLED" to this VPRINTK(). Something like "ata%u: HANDLED protocol...".
> idle_irq: > @@ -4792,6 +4792,9 @@ > return 1; > } > #endif > + VPRINTK("ata%u: protocol %d task_state %d\n", > + ap->id, qc->tf.protocol, ap->hsm_task_state); > + > return 0; /* irq not handled */ > }
Please add additional message "IGNORED" to this VPRINTK(). Something like "ata%u: IGNORED protocol ...".
Thanks,
Albert
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |