Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:22:12 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization |
| |
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:17:19 -0700 "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote on Saturday, June 03, 2006 1:11 AM > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > looks really good now to me. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > > > > > lets try it in -mm? > > > > > > > Yup. I redid Ken's patch against mainline and them mangled > > lock-validator-special-locking-schedc.patch to suit. > > Hmm, wish I knew this beforehand, so that I won't spend extra 1/2 > hour to port the patch to -mm and only to have you convert it back > to mainline. I could just post the version I originally had against > the mainline. >
Unless you're specifically working against code which is only in -mm (or a subsystem tree), please work against mainline.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |