lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:17:19 -0700
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote on Saturday, June 03, 2006 1:11 AM
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > > looks really good now to me.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > >
> > > lets try it in -mm?
> > >
> >
> > Yup. I redid Ken's patch against mainline and them mangled
> > lock-validator-special-locking-schedc.patch to suit.
>
> Hmm, wish I knew this beforehand, so that I won't spend extra 1/2
> hour to port the patch to -mm and only to have you convert it back
> to mainline. I could just post the version I originally had against
> the mainline.
>

Unless you're specifically working against code which is only in -mm (or a
subsystem tree), please work against mainline.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-03 10:24    [W:0.033 / U:0.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site