lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 3 Jun 2006 01:11:07 -0700
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 09:49:20 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Chen, Kenneth W <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  sched.c |  168 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
> 
> looks really good now to me.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> 
> lets try it in -mm?
> 

Yup.  I redid Ken's patch against mainline and them mangled
lock-validator-special-locking-schedc.patch to suit.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-03 10:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2008