Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:41:13 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 64bit resource: fix up printks for resources in ide drivers |
| |
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > commit 08f46de9a0e7c293db34cf44f9451d18ef609770 > tree 83c28b79165adee350aad8cb9d4e2e59486acf56 > parent 176dfc633bbe4e03f4557d2beeefb4f0cc7f0efa > author Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:15:59 -0700 > committer Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:23:59 -0700 > > [PATCH] 64bit resource: fix up printks for resources in ide drivers > > This is needed if we wish to change the size of the resource structures. > > Based on an original patch from Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> > > Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c | 3 ++- > drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c | 3 ++- > drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.c | 2 +- > drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c | 4 ++-- > 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c b/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > index c743e68..8d5b872 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > @@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > > if (dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start) { > pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE); > - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, > + (unsigned long)dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > } > > if (bus_speed <= 33) > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c b/drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c > index 3d9c7af..9828039 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c > @@ -609,7 +609,8 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > #ifdef __i386__ > if (dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start) { > pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE); > - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, > + (unsigned long)dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > } > #endif > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.c b/drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.c > index be334da..7da5502 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/hpt34x.c > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, > dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE); > printk(KERN_INFO "HPT345: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", > - dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > + (unsigned long)dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > } > pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 0xF0); > } else { > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c > index acd6317..20d5965 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c > @@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > if (dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start) { > pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, > dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE); > - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", > - name, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, > + (unsigned long)dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PMAC > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c > index 22d1754..ffbef74 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c > @@ -544,8 +544,8 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > if (dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start) { > pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, > dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE); > - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", > - name, dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start); > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: ROM enabled at 0x%08lx\n", name, > + (unsigned long)dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start);
Why cast to unsigned long here? Won't that truncate the data in certain cases, now that it is 64bit?
Other printk patches seem to use unsigned long long, as I would expect.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |