Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 of 2 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sat, 04 Mar 2006 05:54:35 +0100 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:58 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
> If you're going to manage the time slice in nanoseconds why not do it > properly? I presume you've held back a bit in case you break something? >
Do you mean the < NS_TICK thing? The spare change doesn't go away.
> If it helps, the smpnice balancing code's use of static_prio_timeslice() > doesn't really care what units it's return value is in as long as > DEF_TIMESLICE is in the same units and contains the size of a time slice > allocated to a nice==0 non RT task.
Ok, thanks. I wanted to make very certain I couldn't screw it up. Still, it's simpler to just leave it in ticks.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |