[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: interactive task starvation
    On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > great work by Mike! One detail: i'd like there to be just one default
    > throttling value, i.e. no grace_g tunables [so that we have just one
    > default scheduler behavior]. Is the default grace_g[12] setting good
    > enough for your workload?

    I agree. If anything is required, a simple on/off tunable makes much more
    sense. Much like I suggested ages ago with an "interactive" switch which was
    rather unpopular when I first suggested it. Perhaps my marketing was wrong.
    Oh well.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-21 12:56    [W:0.020 / U:2.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site