[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: interactive task starvation
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> great work by Mike! One detail: i'd like there to be just one default
> throttling value, i.e. no grace_g tunables [so that we have just one
> default scheduler behavior]. Is the default grace_g[12] setting good
> enough for your workload?

I agree. If anything is required, a simple on/off tunable makes much more
sense. Much like I suggested ages ago with an "interactive" switch which was
rather unpopular when I first suggested it. Perhaps my marketing was wrong.
Oh well.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-21 12:56    [W:0.123 / U:14.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site