Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: interactive task starvation | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:24:16 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:07:58PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > I can make the knobs compile time so we don't see random behavior > > reports, but I don't think they can be totally eliminated. Would that > > be sufficient? > > > > If so, the numbers as delivered should be fine for desktop boxen I > > think. People who are building custom kernels can bend to fit as > > always. > > That would suit me perfectly. I think I would set them both to zero. > It's not clear to me what workload they can help, it seems that they > try to allow a sometimes unfair scheduling.
Correct. Massively unfair scheduling is what interactivity requires.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |