lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] Prevent spinlock debug from timing out too early
Date

In modern Linux loops_per_jiffie doesn't have much relationship to how
fast the CPU can really execute loops because delay works in a different way.
Unfortunately the spinlock debugging code used it for that, which
caused it it time timeout much earlier that a second.

A second is quite a long time for a spinlock, but there are situations
that can hold them quite long (debug output over slow serial
line, SCSI driver in recovery etc.), so it's better to not time out
too early.

This patch changes it to use jiffies to check for the timeout.
It has the small drawback over the previous case that if jiffies
doesn't tick anymore you won't get any timed out spinlocks, but
normally NMI watchdog should catch that anyways.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

Index: linux-2.6.15/lib/spinlock_debug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/lib/spinlock_debug.c
+++ linux-2.6.15/lib/spinlock_debug.c
@@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static inline void debug_spin_unlock(spi
static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t *lock)
{
int print_once = 1;
- u64 i;

for (;;) {
- for (i = 0; i < loops_per_jiffy * HZ; i++) {
- cpu_relax();
+ unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
+ while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
if (__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock))
return;
+ cpu_relax();
}
/* lockup suspected: */
if (print_once) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-06 22:25    [W:1.148 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site